🚹”THAT DREAD:FUL DAY RETURNS ONCE MORE…” — James Bulger K-ll3r Jon Venables Bids for Parole Again After Filing for ReleaseđŸ˜± While the James’s Mother Declares: “He Will NEVER Walk Free!” — as She Reveals Secret Files That Could Force Justice to Be Served Once More đŸ˜ĄđŸ”„

More than thirty years after the murder that shocked Britain, the name Jon Venables is once again echoing through court corridors — and for James Bulger’s mother, Denise Fergus, it feels like that dreadful day has returned.

Sources close to the Parole Board have confirmed that Venables, now in his early 40s, has formally submitted another bid for parole, which could be reviewed before the end of 2025. The decision will determine whether one of the two boys who abducted and murdered two-year-old James Bulger in 1993 will ever walk free again.

Venables, who was just ten years old at the time of the crime, was released in 2001 under a new identity but later re-imprisoned for possessing child abuse images. Since then, every attempt to seek parole has been met with public outrage — and fierce opposition from James’s family.

Speaking exclusively ahead of the expected hearing, Denise Fergus told reporters:

“He should never see the light of day again. My son never got another chance — why should he?”

Fergus revealed she has obtained new confidential documents, which she says raise serious questions about Venables’ rehabilitation and ongoing risk to the public. “There are things the public deserves to know,” she added, “and I won’t stop until justice is truly done — again.”

Legal experts suggest that the Parole Board will likely review Venables’s psychological reports, prison conduct, and risk assessment. Yet many believe his release would be “a danger to public trust” given the magnitude of the original crime and his reoffending history.

If approved, Venables could quietly walk free by early 2026 — under yet another new identity funded by the state. But campaigners, led by Fergus, are calling for a full public inquiry into how the system continues to “protect” him at taxpayers’ expense.

The case remains one of Britain’s deepest scars — a story of a stolen child, a grieving mother, and a justice system forever struggling between punishment and rehabilitation.

As the next parole hearing looms, Denise Fergus vows she will be there, once more, staring across the courtroom at the man who took her son’s life.

“He will never be free,” she repeats. “Not while I’m still breathing.”